A bit of satire...

[Keyser Soze]

To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

By A. Whitney Brown


And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there’s my Redneck American, okay… For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.

You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They’re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.

The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you’re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it’s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?

We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It’s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.

We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that’s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you’re going to get tired of winning. You’ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can’t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

[Poquito Loco]

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there’s my Redneck American, okay… For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They’re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you’re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it’s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It’s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that’s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you’re going to get tired of winning. You’ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can’t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare - 'winning again'.

[Califbill]

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there’s my Redneck American, okay… For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They’re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you’re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it’s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It’s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that’s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you’re going to get tired of winning. You’ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can’t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

[Poquito Loco]

Post by Califbill

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there?s my Redneck American, okay? For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They?re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you?re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it?s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It?s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that?s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you?re going to get tired of winning. You?ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can?t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

I think the news today said it'd gone up over 30% in one year, and that was due to less tax income.
Gosh, I suppose the welfare recipients should pay more taxes.

[Califbill]

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Califbill

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there?s my Redneck American, okay? For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They?re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you?re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it?s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It?s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that?s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you?re going to get tired of winning. You?ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can?t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

I think the news today said it'd gone up over 30% in one year, and that
was due to less tax income.
Gosh, I suppose the welfare recipients should pay more taxes.

Over regulation, and government sucking up investment money. Hard to
create jobs in that scenario.

[amdx]

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Califbill

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there?s my Redneck American, okay? For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They?re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you?re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it?s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It?s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that?s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you?re going to get tired of winning. You?ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can?t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

I think the news today said it'd gone up over 30% in one year, and that was due to less tax income.
Gosh, I suppose the welfare recipients should pay more taxes.

At End of 2007 the Federal dept was $8.9 trillion.
Today in 2016, the Federal dept is $19.3 trillion.
It took 43 presidents 231 years create a $8.9 trillion debt
and 8 years for Obama to steal an additional $10.4 trillion from future
taxpayers.
The "Federal debt as percent of GDP" in 2007 was 63%. Today is has
increased to more than 106%.

Mikek

[amdx]

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Califbill

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there?s my Redneck American, okay? For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have
diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They?re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you?re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it?s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It?s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that?s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you?re going to get tired of winning. You?ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can?t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

I think the news today said it'd gone up over 30% in one year, and
that was due to less tax income.
Gosh, I suppose the welfare recipients should pay more taxes.

At End of 2007 the Federal debt was $8.9 trillion.
Today in 2016, the Federal debt is $19.3 trillion.
It took 43 presidents 231 years create a $8.9 trillion debt
and 8 years for Obama to steal an additional $10.4 trillion from future
taxpayers.
The "Federal debt as percent of GDP" in 2007 was 63%. Today is has
increased to more than 106%.
Mikek

Fixed typo.

[Poquito Loco]

Post by amdx

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Califbill

Post by Poquito Loco

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose
By A. Whitney Brown
And now, to my Redneck American Community, where are my Rednecks? There
they are, there?s my Redneck American, okay? For generations, you have
been giving your vote to the Republicans, and what has it gotten you?
Nothing! Your lives are a catastrophe, believe me. You have no health
care, your children are all dying of meth and heroin, you have no
education, you are shooting yourselves with your own guns on accident
every day. So sad. Just a disaster.
You have been losing, losing, losing. The big banks are buying all your
farms, you have nothing to eat but junk food, you all have diabetes, and
your water is totally poisoned from all the fracking going on.
Absolutely horrendous. A complete waste. And what do you get for it?
Nothing! Even the gays are better off than you. They?re taking all your
marriages. Your homes are totally broken, I can tell you.
The Republicans have totally taken you for granted. They think you?re
stupid! They are taking advantage of you and it?s got to end, believe
me. The Democrats will straighten this out so fast it will make your
head spin. We will give you Medicaid, if you will just vote in a
Democrat governor, believe me. It will happen. I guarantee it. What the
hell do you have to lose?
We will fix your environment, we will clean up your water, we will help
you get educated, and we will take the guns away from your crazy
neighbor. It?s going to be beautiful, believe me. We will give you
Obamacare, we will give you an Obamaphone, and we will help your
children go to college if they are smart enough. We will fix your roads
and and bridges and we will stock lunker bass in all your fishing holes.
We are going to build bridges and roads, and send your kids to college.
And who is going to pay for it? The billionaires, that?s right. They are
going to pay their fair share once and for all. You are going to start
winning again, and it is going to be beautiful. You are going to win so
much you?re going to get tired of winning. You?ll say, Democrats, stop
with the winning all the time, I can?t take it, and we will say, no, we
are going to keep on winning for all the Redneck Americans. We will be
your voice! What the hell do you have to lose, I ask you? And after 4
years, I guarantee you we will have 95 percent of the Redneck American
vote. I guarantee it. Believe me. Just give us a chance.

I am sure the Democrats would like at least 60% of the country on welfare
- 'winning again'.

Obama is looking at $590,000,000,000 deficit this year. How much of that
is because you failed to pay your taxes? The economy is doing better?

I think the news today said it'd gone up over 30% in one year, and
that was due to less tax income.
Gosh, I suppose the welfare recipients should pay more taxes.

At End of 2007 the Federal debt was $8.9 trillion.
Today in 2016, the Federal debt is $19.3 trillion.
It took 43 presidents 231 years create a $8.9 trillion debt
and 8 years for Obama to steal an additional $10.4 trillion from future
taxpayers.
The "Federal debt as percent of GDP" in 2007 was 63%. Today is has
increased to more than 106%.
Mikek

Fixed typo.

Krause doesn't address facts.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.

I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

[Poquito Loco]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.
I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

Well said. YKW will most likely pass over this one.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.
I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

Oh,you think the Repugnants or the Loonytarians give a damn about
the Poor? That is hilarious.
--

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.
I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

Oh,you think the Repugnants or the Loonytarians give a damn about
the Poor? That is hilarious.

The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

[Keyser Söze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.
I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

Oh,you think the Repugnants or the Loonytarians give a damn about
the Poor? That is hilarious.

The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

Thank you, Donald

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Söze

Post by g***@aol.com
The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

Thank you, Donald

I think he stole that line from me. I have been saying it for a while.
I guess plagiarism is not a foreign concept to the Trumps ;-)

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Still can't get rid of that ad huh?

[Its Me]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze

Post by g***@aol.com
The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

Thank you, Donald

I think he stole that line from me. I have been saying it for a while.
I guess plagiarism is not a foreign concept to the Trumps ;-)

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Still can't get rid of that ad huh?

You can make an old iPhone 4 say whatever you want.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by Its Me

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze

Post by g***@aol.com
The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

Thank you, Donald

I think he stole that line from me. I have been saying it for a while.
I guess plagiarism is not a foreign concept to the Trumps ;-)

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Still can't get rid of that ad huh?

You can make an old iPhone 4 say whatever you want.

The taglines on iPhones are settable through the usenet client software
you use. Once choice is to use none. I have a reason for using the
tagline I've selected.

[Keyser Söze]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by Its Me

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze

Post by g***@aol.com
The democrats only care about the poor VOTE.

Thank you, Donald

I think he stole that line from me. I have been saying it for a while.
I guess plagiarism is not a foreign concept to the Trumps ;-)

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Still can't get rid of that ad huh?

You can make an old iPhone 4 say whatever you want.

The taglines on iPhones are settable through the usenet client software
you use. Once choice is to use none. I have a reason for using the
tagline I've selected.

Like so:

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

I had and have a reason to ID my cellphone posts. Apple doesn't need my
help selling its products.
Trump, on the other hand, seems helpless and hopeless.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

I had and have a reason to ID my cellphone posts. Apple doesn't need my
help selling its products.

Actually I-phone sales have been soft lately. There is just not enough
new innovation to get people out of their old phone

Post by Keyser Soze
Trump, on the other hand, seems helpless and hopeless.

Trump is pretty bad but so is the democrat candidate. The whole cycle
is just sad. When you have mainstream politicians like Susan Collins
talking about voting for Gary you know things are getting strange.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

I had and have a reason to ID my cellphone posts. Apple doesn't need my
help selling its products.

Actually I-phone sales have been soft lately. There is just not enough
new innovation to get people out of their old phone

Post by Keyser Soze
Trump, on the other hand, seems helpless and hopeless.

Trump is pretty bad but so is the democrat candidate. The whole cycle
is just sad. When you have mainstream politicians like Susan Collins
talking about voting for Gary you know things are getting strange.

Sorry, I don't accept your never-ending attempts at trying to link up
Trump and Clinton as equivalents.
I don't give a tinker's dam about "Gary," so long as he cuts into
Trump's vote total, which I think will happen on election day. I don't
see by then Johnson having much impact on Hillary voters.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

I had and have a reason to ID my cellphone posts. Apple doesn't need my
help selling its products.

Actually I-phone sales have been soft lately. There is just not enough
new innovation to get people out of their old phone

Post by Keyser Soze
Trump, on the other hand, seems helpless and hopeless.

Trump is pretty bad but so is the democrat candidate. The whole cycle
is just sad. When you have mainstream politicians like Susan Collins
talking about voting for Gary you know things are getting strange.

Sorry, I don't accept your never-ending attempts at trying to link up
Trump and Clinton as equivalents.
I don't give a tinker's dam about "Gary," so long as he cuts into
Trump's vote total, which I think will happen on election day. I don't
see by then Johnson having much impact on Hillary voters.

I am not saying they are the same, only that both are unacceptable ...
for different reasons.
When more than half of the country says they do not trust Hillary and
more than that say they don't trust Trump, it is not unreasonable to
look at other options.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Söze
--
Donald Trump is a racist pig.

At least you are making a statement and not just pimping for Tim Cook.

I had and have a reason to ID my cellphone posts. Apple doesn't need my
help selling its products.

Actually I-phone sales have been soft lately. There is just not enough
new innovation to get people out of their old phone

Post by Keyser Soze
Trump, on the other hand, seems helpless and hopeless.

Trump is pretty bad but so is the democrat candidate. The whole cycle
is just sad. When you have mainstream politicians like Susan Collins
talking about voting for Gary you know things are getting strange.

Sorry, I don't accept your never-ending attempts at trying to link up
Trump and Clinton as equivalents.
I don't give a tinker's dam about "Gary," so long as he cuts into
Trump's vote total, which I think will happen on election day. I don't
see by then Johnson having much impact on Hillary voters.

I am not saying they are the same, only that both are unacceptable ...
for different reasons.
When more than half of the country says they do not trust Hillary and
more than that say they don't trust Trump, it is not unreasonable to
look at other options.

There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.

If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.

As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

[Califbill]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

What ideas does Hillary have that will improve the country? She was a
failure as an attorney, failure as First Lady and healthcare, failure as
SoS and same ideas that we have had for the last 40 years where we have
gone downhill.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by Califbill

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

What ideas does Hillary have that will improve the country? She was a
failure as an attorney, failure as First Lady and healthcare, failure as
SoS and same ideas that we have had for the last 40 years where we have
gone downhill.

Go find Zell and vote for him, Bilious.

[Califbill]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by Califbill

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

What ideas does Hillary have that will improve the country? She was a
failure as an attorney, failure as First Lady and healthcare, failure as
SoS and same ideas that we have had for the last 40 years where we have
gone downhill.

Go find Zell and vote for him, Bilious.

Gary, Gary, Gary

[Keyser Soze]

Post by Califbill

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by Califbill

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

What ideas does Hillary have that will improve the country? She was a
failure as an attorney, failure as First Lady and healthcare, failure as
SoS and same ideas that we have had for the last 40 years where we have
gone downhill.

Go find Zell and vote for him, Bilious.

Gary, Gary, Gary

Good. Encourage your Republican buddies in contested states to do the same.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

[Tom Nofinger]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Krause is good at that.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

[Mr. Luddite]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

It's interesting to do a Google search for "greatest presidents". Iran
Contra may be his greatest legacy fault in the minds of
progressive liberals like Harry but overall he is more often than not
rated in the top ten, regardless of the source of evaluation.
Obama doesn't come close.

[Tim]

Post by Mr. Luddite

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

It's interesting to do a Google search for "greatest presidents". Iran
Contra may be his greatest legacy fault in the minds of
progressive liberals like Harry but overall he is more often than not
rated in the top ten, regardless of the source of evaluation.
Obama doesn't come close.

I thought Ron had some flaws, but otherwise was a great president.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Tim

Post by Mr. Luddite
It's interesting to do a Google search for "greatest presidents". Iran
Contra may be his greatest legacy fault in the minds of
progressive liberals like Harry but overall he is more often than not
rated in the top ten, regardless of the source of evaluation.
Obama doesn't come close.

I thought Ron had some flaws, but otherwise was a great president.

Yup, when you look at the biggest problems we face, none of them are
on Reagan. He added just 5% of our $20 Billion debt (Obama added
almost half). None of our ongoing wars are his. The destruction of the
corporate safety net happened after he left. The disastrous trade
deals and tax policies that have off shored so many of our jobs are
not his. That all came from Bush (x2), Clinton and Obama and splitting
hairs beyond that is a distinction without a difference.

[Tim]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Tim

Post by Mr. Luddite
It's interesting to do a Google search for "greatest presidents". Iran
Contra may be his greatest legacy fault in the minds of
progressive liberals like Harry but overall he is more often than not
rated in the top ten, regardless of the source of evaluation.
Obama doesn't come close.

I thought Ron had some flaws, but otherwise was a great president.

Yup, when you look at the biggest problems we face, none of them are
on Reagan. He added just 5% of our $20 Billion debt (Obama added
almost half). None of our ongoing wars are his. The destruction of the
corporate safety net happened after he left. The disastrous trade
deals and tax policies that have off shored so many of our jobs are
not his. That all came from Bush (x2), Clinton and Obama and splitting
hairs beyond that is a distinction without a difference.

and im sure it would have happened by now, but he was also a key instrument in helping bust the soviet union andthe soviet block. But people were getting tired of the Russian Marxist way of doing things anyhow.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

I didn't say or imply it was "all Reagan's fault." You really ought to
try harder not to post what you think I am thinking, because you
invariably are wrong.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

I didn't say or imply it was "all Reagan's fault." You really ought to
try harder not to post what you think I am thinking, because you
invariably are wrong.

I only have what you write on which to base what I believe you think.
Perhaps it is the lack of consistency in your responses that give me
the wrong impression.
It is still a fact that Hillary is ass deep in the Bush quagmires.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

I didn't say or imply it was "all Reagan's fault." You really ought to
try harder not to post what you think I am thinking, because you
invariably are wrong.

I only have what you write on which to base what I believe you think.
Perhaps it is the lack of consistency in your responses that give me
the wrong impression.
It is still a fact that Hillary is ass deep in the Bush quagmires.

There virtually are no issues I consider "core" to me on which I find
agreement with today's Republicans, or Republicans going back to Reagan.
I'm not even sure that Trump was the worst of the recent bunch of
Republicans. I don't agree with Hillary on all the issues, but on most
of them, we're on the same track.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

I didn't say or imply it was "all Reagan's fault." You really ought to
try harder not to post what you think I am thinking, because you
invariably are wrong.

I only have what you write on which to base what I believe you think.
Perhaps it is the lack of consistency in your responses that give me
the wrong impression.
It is still a fact that Hillary is ass deep in the Bush quagmires.

There virtually are no issues I consider "core" to me on which I find
agreement with today's Republicans, or Republicans going back to Reagan.
I'm not even sure that Trump was the worst of the recent bunch of
Republicans. I don't agree with Hillary on all the issues, but on most
of them, we're on the same track.

It is hard to agree with Hillary and disagree with the Bush clan
unless your "core issues" are pretty superficial.

[Keyser Soze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

You started like you had a response, then you dribbled off into a
canned trade against Reagan.

Nothing canned about it.

It certainly sounded like one of your bumper sticker responses.
It is only interesting that it is all Reagan's fault now.
I suppose you have to lay off the Bushes because the Clintons owe us
an apology for the same mistakes GW and GHW made. (Bad wars, bad trade
deals, mass incarceration of people of color etc).
Reagan won twice, the second time in a rout, just because the people
thought he was better than anyone the democrats ran and right or
wrong, they trusted him.
Less than 10% trust both candidates now and neither can raise much
more than the low 40 percentile about trust individually.
I doubt we have ever had such a slate of untrustworthy candidates
running from the major parties.
In that kind of environment, conventional wisdom about who can't be
elected, starts to unravel at the edges.

I didn't say or imply it was "all Reagan's fault." You really ought to
try harder not to post what you think I am thinking, because you
invariably are wrong.

I only have what you write on which to base what I believe you think.
Perhaps it is the lack of consistency in your responses that give me
the wrong impression.
It is still a fact that Hillary is ass deep in the Bush quagmires.

There virtually are no issues I consider "core" to me on which I find
agreement with today's Republicans, or Republicans going back to Reagan.
I'm not even sure that Trump was the worst of the recent bunch of
Republicans. I don't agree with Hillary on all the issues, but on most
of them, we're on the same track.

It is hard to agree with Hillary and disagree with the Bush clan
unless your "core issues" are pretty superficial.

Oh, really? Now you've put yourself in charge of which political issues
are meaningful and which are superficial?
Let's be real here: being a Libertarian and voting Libertarian is the
very definition of superficial, because the votes for Libertarians don't
matter.

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com
It is hard to agree with Hillary and disagree with the Bush clan
unless your "core issues" are pretty superficial.

Oh, really? Now you've put yourself in charge of which political issues
are meaningful and which are superficial?
Let's be real here: being a Libertarian and voting Libertarian is the
very definition of superficial, because the votes for Libertarians don't
matter.

When the major differences are which bathroom transvestites use, gay
marriage, some insignificant gun legislation, abortion and subtle
differences in how the government gives money to poor people, I say
they are superficial.
Until someone actually addresses the debt and the wars, everything
else is superficial.

[Keyser Söze]

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com
It is hard to agree with Hillary and disagree with the Bush clan
unless your "core issues" are pretty superficial.

Oh, really? Now you've put yourself in charge of which political issues
are meaningful and which are superficial?
Let's be real here: being a Libertarian and voting Libertarian is the
very definition of superficial, because the votes for Libertarians don't
matter.

When the major differences are which bathroom transvestites use, gay
marriage, some insignificant gun legislation, abortion and subtle
differences in how the government gives money to poor people, I say
they are superficial.
Until someone actually addresses the debt and the wars, everything
else is superficial.

There you go again

[g***@aol.com]

Post by Keyser Söze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com
It is hard to agree with Hillary and disagree with the Bush clan
unless your "core issues" are pretty superficial.

Oh, really? Now you've put yourself in charge of which political issues
are meaningful and which are superficial?
Let's be real here: being a Libertarian and voting Libertarian is the
very definition of superficial, because the votes for Libertarians don't
matter.

When the major differences are which bathroom transvestites use, gay
marriage, some insignificant gun legislation, abortion and subtle
differences in how the government gives money to poor people, I say
they are superficial.
Until someone actually addresses the debt and the wars, everything
else is superficial.

There you go again

Channeling Reagan?

[Tom Nofinger]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
There are no other viable options. The few times I have seen Johnson
interviewed, he came across as a nice guy but a know-nothing on
important issues and goofy on others, and bereft of ideas that address
many of the issues we face. I don't know how far back you'd have to go,
personally, to find a POTUS you'd find "acceptable." Wouldn't be Reagan,
with the bullshit he spewed on Iran many times.

The only reason they are not viable is because people like you say so.
Last time I looked, I can vote for anyone on the ballot and with a
little more work, write in someone who isn't.
If the 2 candidates the major parties are this bad, maybe it is time
to look at the other people who are on your ballot.
You certainly could not find some with fewer credentials than Obama in
2008 and we survived.
As for previous presidents, you only have the various version of
"Bush" for the last 28 years so it is hard to say.
They all have common staffers, common financiers and common policies.
People voted for Reagan because he wasn't Carter. In that regard, it
was successful and 4 years later it was resounding.

I can't imagine going through life politically with the sort of
simple-minded pablum you prefer. Many of the problems we face today are
an outgrowth of Reagan's incompetency. HE won re-election by a large
margin, but he was an awful president.

Bullshit, Krause. You're so politically correct, all you crave is political pablum.
Really, the only reason you say Reagan was an awful president is because he busted unions.

[Califbill]

Post by Keyser Soze

Post by g***@aol.com

Post by Keyser Soze
To My Redneck American Community: What The Hell Do You Have to Lose

I think the flip side of that would be to those in the democrat strong
holds.
They have been supporting their party for 5 decades. Poverty is worse
than it was in 66, there is more violent crime in your neighborhoods,
more of your daughters are pregnant and unwed in their teens,
graduation rates from high schools are in the 30 percentile in the
better cities, wages have been stagnant since the Carter
administration and far lower for you. Your son is born knowing he has
a 75% chance of being in the justice system and a 66% chance of going
to jail. You chance of being murdered os 20 times higher than a person
who lives in a western "red" state.
Unemployment in your community is easily twice that of a red state and
housing is more expensive.
I could go on but that is depressing enough, yet these shit holes
remain to be solid blue.

Oh,you think the Repugnants or the Loonytarians give a damn about
the Poor? That is hilarious.

If the D mocrats cared about the poor, other than as voters, there would
not be a bigger percentage of poor now than when the War on Poverty was
created.